Itching Patch Of Small Lumps On Stomach

Nella vecchia fattoria...

Lately Italian animal rights, incited by an article in the newspaper, have unleashed against the Niguarda hospital. What suggests the newspaper known for its rapid-fire and shit, it refuses to repeat the administration of the hospital in Milan, it seems that during a day have been carried out operations on pigs for educational purposes.

Now, I omit volunteered the fact that between the direction of a hospital that saves lives every day and a newspaper whose informational value is often equal to that of toilet paper, would also be stupid to ask who to believe.

omit the fact that vivisection for educational purposes is prohibited by law and so I doubt that the Niguarda just set yourself up to break the law to make a single day of gastrointestinal surgery.

also omit the fact that I have never read an article or saw an animal rights protest against the producers of sausages almost as if, of course, kill a pig to eat is quite different dall'ammazzarlo to learn how to do delicate surgery.

Tralascio tutti questi discorsi e prendo per buono il fatto che "il Giornale" abbia scritto per la prima volta nella sua carriera post-Montanelli, la verità; prendo per buono il fatto che il Niguarda abbia violato la legge; e prendo anche per buono che il comportamento degli animalisti non sia ipocrita.

La mia domanda diventa: e quindi? Dei maiali morti in cambio di qualche chirurgo più esperto e che quindi non rischia di sbagliare mentre opera un bambino. Personalmente lo considero uno scambio più che equo. Anzi, personalmente sterminerei l'intera popolazione suina con una forchetta da olive anche per salvare un vecchio novantenne. Un essere umano, un membro della mia specie, è sempre e comunque superiore, in my eyes, of an animal.

And if all these animals are so shocked and disgusted by the death of a pig, they propose an alternative: instead of writing emails and indignation for thirty seconds from the comfort of your living room, you something useful. You do not want the surgeon experience on the pig? Well. Proponetevi as human guinea pigs. I personally do not care if the surgeon's experience on a pig or your child. So whip out your balls, hippies! Put your children, your parents and yourself under the knife for the welfare of pigs! Or you do not feel that the life of an animal is important only in play when the other side is the life of someone else?

But in the end do not feel offended. Mine is just a senseless provocation. The law, as I said, already exists and will be right. The technology allows you to avoid even this issue is raised at all. So this is just an outburst of a greedy fool. You can skip this article and my return to sign the petitions on Facebook against yet another village in the Third World killing stray dogs. Because in a world where there are still your fellow human beings dying of hunger or diseases or jumping in the air on our own mines, the biggest problem are four dogs.

soon!

Pusooy Cheerleader Party Part 2 Forum

Lost

Dopo sei anni, dopo che finalmente la storia è finita, eccomi qua a fare un breve commento su Lost. Moltissimi hanno parlato di questa serie per insultarla o per esaltarla. Personalmente ho solo da dire una cosa: Lost rappresenta solo l'ultimo esempio di prodotto cinematografico e televisivo dell'ultima generazione in cui, storia e sceneggiatura vengono messi da parte in favore di valore commerciale.

Moltissimi fan di Lost protesteranno dicendo che Lost invece ha un significato profondo. Beh, ho atteso il finale prima di parlare e fortunatamente, con la "sorpresa finale" Abrams e soci mi hanno reso la critica anche più facile. 

The latest episode shows how the entire history of this issue is only the characters and their history and evolution. Then the whole story of Lost can be summed up in this single sentence: "a dozen people with personal problems encountered by chance, solve their problems, die and be happy together in the afterlife." Fine. The island, Jacob, the black smoke monster, the Dharma, and any other matter, or not explained, were merely narrative devices to force us to watch the show for six years. Everything could be set in an empty room and the whole "message" would not be changed in any way.

But the end brings us also to understand what has Lost made famous: the characters. between good and charismatic actors with a long and extensive background, the series has meant that all remained glued to the screen, explanations or not.

But knowing how to define the characters, have a cast of exceptional actors, just ? No. Unfortunately not. The film is also the art of story-telling of a story that knows how to entertain and excite. And surely if the actors of Lost engage in an exemplary way to get emotions from even the most cliché scenes like the final embrace, the writers show total unwillingness to write a complete story. Lost's characters constantly face problems lanciatigli against them without reason and without any logical conclusion that these are, so that even the characters are often forced to act completely irrational and silly just to send the story forward. History which, as already mentioned, among blacks smoke, trap doors, time travel and a thousand other crap, really serves no purpose if not to compel viewers to watch the sequel too. As the only thing that matters is the introspective journey of the characters.

To conclude therefore, strongly advise against all travel to address this very long and dull. If you want to watch a story just as chaotic but a billion times deeper and you will think 100 times more than the same time without burning Lost, watch Donnie Darko or even a film of Lynch.

the next.

How Can I Play Pmp Files?

La Nostra Vita

Lucchetti's new film brings the viewer to the test, especially from the emotional point of view. Here I am, exhausted, having just returned from the cinema, to write this comment and I already know that the weight that I pasted him accompany me for a few days. But first things first.

The film tells the story of Claudio, a father of two sons and Roman construction worker who finds himself faced with the sudden death of his wife in childbirth. Will then forced to find their own way to mourn that hit him, pinching yourself in a risky business.

What more is astonishing in front of this film is the superb acting of Elio Germano, that makes us breathe with him the constant pain of the protagonist. But the director of Locks is not far behind and, in claustrophobic close-ups, camera manual and found a lot to Ken Loach, throws us into the life of Claudio, without ever allowing a breathing space, forcing us to walk with him every single hard step taken. A round of applause also goes to two writers who, together with the director, they create a realistic story and well written, with dialogue that pass quickly the dramatic tone to the ironic, never out of tune.

So no downside? Yes, unfortunately yes. The film, however well done, does not reach the level of the previous work Lucchetti. Not have the same wide-ranging and ultimately tossed the viewer inside the story, to dwell a bit 'too much on minor subplots.

Apart from this, is a film worth watching, especially for the incredible force of acting by Elio Germano: I challenge anyone to look at the scene of the funeral and not to be the goose bumps and tears in his eyes.
the next.

Canker Sore Or Herpes

Censura.

There are about two weeks that I rate whether to publish or not publish this post. Not so much because I did not clear what to say but it might be seen as an insult. But in the end I thought that if I censor my post on censorship, I would feel hypocritical than that idiot. So here I am.

As you know all the censorship affects the art ever since. Whenever an idea is censored, the head of the censorship attempts to explain why in a rational and balanced. And each time it is just a river of shit to hide the real reason: The complaint is an act of violence that is born only and only by ignorance and cowardice of those who carry it.

But there are rare cases, although lately more frequent, in which the complaint is wearing a different dress and disguised as respect. Because when the art or the simple touch on difficult subjects individual freedom becomes very easy to confuse opinion, a criticism or a joke for an insult. And in the name of tolerance and respect is censorship.

E 'happened again a few days ago that the challenge from Comedy Central cartoon South Park, after receiving death threats for having joked with Muhammad. I was amazed at the behavior of Trey Parker and Matt Stone, two people who have never been afraid to address difficult issues. But, leaving aside their choice, I want to focus on the reason for the complaint: the mockery of the Muslim Prophet.

I remember as a child when my parents told me not to play with the saints, to take religion seriously as sacred. But at the same time I also taught to think without preconceptions, to not take anything for granted, to be curious. But questions arise from curiosity, questions arise criticisms and criticisms are born teasing.

When freedom becomes an insult? Maybe you should set limits?

In my opinion, no, never.

Freedom of speech is one of the greatest achievements of man and should never be limited. Even when this freedom allows someone to offend or disrespect other people. In fact, the concept of "offense" is extremely subjective, especially when it concerns a religion or a concentration of dogmas and philosophies that profoundly affect the lives of those who believe.

If I say that, for me, all religions are just a bunch of silly philosophies stunted created for the most part at a time when man did not even know what was the solar system and inevitably simplistic and childish, mixed with rules Medieval created simply to keep the same company and create a vehicle of power to the caste of scammers, it is an insult or an opinion you are free to give?

If I say that, for me, a person following a religion does nothing but hurt himself and voluntarily limit their growth potential and that, teaching the same beliefs and superstitions of his son, by a violence comparable to rape, is an insult or an opinion you are free to give?

If I say that, for me, because there are no moderates, if they existed, moderate Muslims would be the first to denounce Muslims who blow themselves up in the name of a god who does not even have ever seen and that they have nothing but pain and suffering throughout life, and the moderate Catholics were the first to fight for a secular state and to stop those who would change the laws to enforce its dogmas at all like a damned theocracy, is an insult or an opinion you are free to give?

If I say that, for me, a deity who threatens her children not to grow, not to improve, not to work, to remain stupid life, because you have to do as the "lilies of the field" penalty as a punishment Babel or the expulsion from Eden, is a horrible and monstrous deity who wants children and the elderly died of starvation deaths from pneumonia, is an insult or an opinion you are free to give?

If I say that, for me, a religion that exalts the subjugation of women and martyrdom and suffering as purification is a philosophy that only a sadist would teach a child, is an insult or an opinion you are free to give?

Finally, if I say that, for me, because humanity is barely able to see a part of the universe and to visit a village even smaller and exists only by a tiny fraction of even the lifetime of the planet where she was born, claim to know with certainty the existence of a creator and even claim to be able to speak to us in prayer and meditation is arrogant and presumptuous, if not crazy, or is an insult ' review that are free to give?

It is probably easier and better to accept that there are no injuries but only opinions? Because the force ed il fascino della libertà di parola sta proprio in questo: io posso affermare questo, posso perfino bestemmiare Allah, Jahvè o qualsiasi altra divinità ma facendo questo, sono obbligato ad accettare che la stessa libertà la abbiano tutti e che quindi anche un religioso possa insultare me o il mio agnosticismo. Ed io voglio mostrare il mio rispetto e la mia tolleranza difendendo questa libertà, non censurando le mie idee o la mia arte.

Ma mi rendo anche conto che questa stessa forza è ciò che terrorizza i censori. Perché se tutti avessimo lo stesso potere, a resistere, ad attecchire, non sarebbe più l'idea che ha dietro di sé il sostegno del tiranno di turno, ma quella semplicemente più sensata. Ed i censori non possono il rischio perché significherebbe dover confrontarsi con domande difficili e terrificanti di cui hanno già ottenuto una delle tante comode e precompilate risposte. Meglio continuare con i propri riti ed accettare l'oscuramento di qualsiasi cosa possa obbligarci a guardare un'opinione differente. La fede in fondo, deve essere salda come una roccia, chiunque minacci di farla vacillare seppellitecelo sotto.

Alla prossima.

P.s.: alcuni di voi sanno che questo sarebbe dovuto essere il mio primo videolog. Purtroppo, causa la mia enorme pesantezza di sedere, non ho avuto tanto tempo (o voglia) di stare a configurare la videocamera e giochicchiarci un po' per fare editing video. E non volevo far marcire il post nella mia mail per mesi in attesa mi venisse voglia. :-)